Effectiveness of Racial Profiling in Countering Terrorism

Students Name Professors Name Subject Code and Title Is Racial compose an Effective prevent Terrorism Mea surely? The September 11 terror attack on the Ameri washbowl soil was followed by a successive wave of events that were aimed at countering act of terrorist act. As the global engagement on terrorism intensified, racial indite became more pronounced along the corridors of counter-terrorism. Conversely, the employment of racial compose as an instrument for detecting terror suspects and countering terrorism has elicited sharp criticism from different quarters.Even as protagonists of racial write reiterate its effectiveness in combating terrorism, dissenting voices lament the flagrant human rights violations and racial segregations borne of racial profiling. This musical theme critically examines the issues surrounding racial profiling in order to system a benchmark upon which the effectiveness of racial profiling in countering terrorism can be measured. The September 11 attacks on the US soil, which was maven of the single beat acts of terrorism in the worlds history, led to the re-emergence of racial profiling in full force.In a desperate effort to bring to harbour the perpetrators of these attacks, security agencies in the US developed prepossess on Middle-Easterners. These prejudices were then(prenominal) codified into law including additional security measures for Arabs and Muslims leaving and entering the US territory. It is against this backdrop that racial profiling gained prominence non only in the US yet also among its allies. This then raises a very clever concern as to whether racial profiling is effective in countering terrorism across the globe.Security organs more often than not turn in ground detention and interdiction of suspects primarily on the basis of their race, ethnicity and/or religion. Pickering et al argue that racial profiling occurs against the belief that certain minority groups atomic number 18 more likely to engage in unlawful behavior. They further desex that integrating national security into law has opened up the opening that racial profiling is inevitable in predicting crime and identifying potential perpetrators of crime.Profiling is only problematic in terms of its effectiveness given the fact that it is not firstly correlated statistically to risk. Secondly, racial profiling is ineffective in substantially narrowing down a pool of potential suspects (60). Therefore, profiling of suspects fails to meet professional law enforcement principles scarcely instead reflect prejudice and discrimination. Nevertheless, the biggest concerns over profiling lie in the invasion of privacy as well as the erosion of fundamental civil liberties.The US has been on the forefront in advocating for the sharing of Passenger Name Records (PNR) information in an effort to single out possible terror suspects. However, this action constantly subjects individuals of particular ethnicities and religions to additional security checks consequently giving lee personal manner to exacting discrimination (Muffler 241). What authorities do is basically identify names on the PNR that ar Muslim or Arabic in nature. With the perception that Arabs and Muslims are potential terror suspects, they subject bearers of such names to more stringent security screening.This act does not only discriminate affected individuals but it also produces a large number of false positives. Pickering et al have ascertained that large numbers of false positives divert resources needed to levy more productive law enforcement activities. Moreover, false positives draws attention away from square threats and this is welcome news for terrorists. To that respect, racial profiling becomes self-defeating in the sensory faculty that it overlooks mainstream target groups thus ignoring the real danger of homegrown non-target terror groups (62).In the fresh past, we have had terror attacks instigated by native citize ns who have been either stimulate by rotatory religious teachings or who are angry with their governments for reasons cognise to themselves. These individuals are never prioritized by the authorities thus pose a greater danger to national security. Over-emphasis on foreigners paves way for homegrown extremists to designing and execute terror attacks undetected. It is therefore a morally repugnant bore to target individuals as terror suspects based on their race and/or religion.Not all Muslims are terrorists and neither are all people of Arabic origin terrorists. It is really fallacious to generalize Muslims and Arabs as terrorists based on religious and ethnic prejudices. This then means that these individuals who would have otherwise provided give-and-take agency on terror activities become sympathetic to terror groups with whom they share racial and religious inclinations. In the long run, racial profiling degrades favorable coherency it fuels animosity and ends up instig ating more terror attacks that it intended to counter in the first place (Pickering et al 62).Racial alienation in the wake of racial profiling has given rise to a new phenomenon referred to as social terrorism. Intolerance experienced in society today has left victims of racial profiling with indelible marks of acute, episodic and vicarious discrimination. Social terrorism shutters minds, bodies and souls with affected individuals developing serious spiritual disturbances. These disorders may include wondering(a) the essence of living, cessation from religious practices as well as wrong of vitality and aliveness.Spirituality in particular is at the heart of resilience to reverse among people of color. Attacking a persons spiritual beliefs therefore creates individuals prone to radical religious teachings. It is the victims of social terrorism that have been found to cause the worst atrocities against humanity since they have nothing to lose after all (Etiony 97). Profiling indee d increases the detection of terrorists attack in the short run. Through racial profiling, terror suspects have been apprehended before initiating their attacks.In the long run however, racial profiling creates the possibility of dangerous substitution. On the current trajectory, there is no empirical evidence whatsoever exploring the use of racial profiling as a counter terrorism measure. This means that we have no brain whether racial profiling is indeed bearing fruits in countering terrorism or not. What we are a fighte of is how racial profiling has negatively impacted those subjected to it (Center for homo Rights and Global justice 19).It is not my intention to ruffle peoples feathers the wrong way or even stir still waters. To that respect, I will puree my very best to keep friendly skies friendly by excoriate terrorism unreservedly with the strongest words possible. Terrorism destabilizes democracies by attacking the manners and liberties of citizens. It essential be me t with firmness and increased co-operation among democratic countries. However, inasmuch as we must counter terrorism, we must denounce the escalation of barbaric acts that strike down costless victims.People do not immigrate to foreign lands just to bomb them but they rather do so to appreciate the quality of life in these foreign countries. It is therefore incumbent upon the citizens of resident countries to welcome these foreigners and help them commix in their communities. When all is said and done, it is imperative that we win the war on terrorism if we desire to make the world a peaceful haven. This war will not however be won through black and coercive methods of intelligence gathering. Law enforcement agencies must desist from hiding their slothfulness and inefficiencies behind racial bigotry.What is needed is development of security structures for sharing intelligence between security agents and citizens on counter terror activities. Security agencies can no longer affo rd to guard terrorism as a top secret since terrorism affects all people regardless of their spot in society. Fundamental rights must never become casualties of the politics of tending that have characterized States response to the war on terror. A faithful estimation to human rights incorporated in international, regional, and domestic law is the only sure way of securing and protecting all persons.Works Cited Center for Human Rights and Global Justice. permanent Consequences Racial Profiling and Lethal Force in the War on Terror. NY NYU School of Law, 2006. Print. Etiony, Aldarando. Advancing Social Justice Through Clinical Practice. NJ Lawrence Eribaum Associates, 2008. Print. Muffler, J. Steven. Racial Profiling Issues, Data and Analyses. NY Nova Science P, 2006. Print. Pickering, Sharon, McCulloch and Wright-Neville David. Counter-Terrorism Policing Community, Cohesion and Security. NY Springer, 2008. Print.